sabre: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.52
, weapon
Weight: 0.49
, time
Weight: 0.43
, character
Weight: 0.41
, prop
Weight: 0.37
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.28
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.28
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.28
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.28
, oil company
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
is gds system 0.90
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prop, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prop, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(software company, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sabre, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sabre, is gds system)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sabre, is gds system)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sabre, is gds system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sabre, is gds system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sabre, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sabre, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sabre, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sabre, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prop, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(software company, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prop, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(sabre, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)