sack: be vs lovesac

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tackle
Weight: 0.60
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, year
Weight: 0.57
, play
Weight: 0.57
Siblings interception
Weight: 0.33
, punt
Weight: 0.32
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.31
, field goal
Weight: 0.30
, season
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs lovesac 1.00
be vs swaddle 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sack, be vs lovesac)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sack, be vs swaddle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sack, be vs swaddle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sack, be vs swaddle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sack, be vs swaddle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sack, be vs lovesac)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sack, be vs lovesac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sack, be vs lovesac)