safe: has quality right

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, safety
Weight: 0.54
, security system
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, solution
Weight: 0.51
Siblings clean room
Weight: 0.32
, okay
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality right 1.00
has quality bad 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(security system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(safe, has quality right)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(security system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(safe, has quality right)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(safe, has quality right)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(safe, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(safe, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(safe, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(safe, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(safe, has quality right)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(safe, has quality right)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(safe, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)