saint louis: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.64
, king
Weight: 0.58
, united states
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, town
Weight: 0.56
Siblings saint john
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, memphis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(saint louis, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is dangerous)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(memphis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(memphis, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mexico city, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(saint louis, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(saint louis, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(memphis, is dangerous)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexico city, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(saint louis, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)