salad: have use by date

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have use by date 1.00
have use 0.79
have univision 0.76
be in parkes 0.76
be in of 0.76
be in nicaragua 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, have univision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, have use by date)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(meal, be in nicaragua) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, have use by date)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dish, be in parkes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, have use by date)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dish, be in parkes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(meal, be in nicaragua)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dish, have univision)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dish, be in parkes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(meal, be in nicaragua)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dish, have univision)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taco, be in of)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, have univision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(salad, have use by date)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(meal, be in nicaragua) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(salad, have use by date)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dish, be in parkes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(salad, have use by date)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(taco, be in of) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(taco, be in of)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(salad, have use by date)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, have use by date)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dish, be in parkes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(meal, be in nicaragua)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, have univision)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(taco, be in of)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dish, be in parkes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(meal, be in nicaragua)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(salad, have use by date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, have univision)