salad: taste good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.59
, vegetarian
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(salad, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)