salamander: be called creatures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.61
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, endangered species
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, otter
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called creatures 1.00
be called creatures with tails 0.92
creatures with tails 0.90
be called creatures with visible tails 0.87
creatures with visible tails 0.85
be useful to human beings 0.82
be useful to beings 0.81
be similar to frogs 0.75
is amphibian 0.75
is amphibians 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibian)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(frog, is amphibian)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibian)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(salamander, be called creatures)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salamander, is amphibian)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(salamander, is amphibians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be useful to human beings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be useful to beings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be similar to frogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(salamander, is amphibian)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(salamander, is amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(salamander, is amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(salamander, is amphibian)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(salamander, is amphibians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(salamander, is amphibian)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(salamander, be useful to human beings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(salamander, be useful to beings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salamander, be similar to frogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(salamander, be useful to human beings)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(salamander, be useful to beings)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(salamander, be similar to frogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(salamander, be useful to human beings)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(salamander, be useful to beings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(salamander, be similar to frogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibian)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)