sale: decline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
decline 1.00
drop 0.84
decrease 0.84
have on rise kapital 0.81
increase 0.81
be forecasted rise 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(revenue, decrease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(revenue, increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(revenue, decrease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(revenue, decrease)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(revenue, increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(revenue, increase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sale, decline)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sale, drop)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(sale, drop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sale, drop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sale, decrease)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sale, decrease)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sale, decline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sale, decline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(revenue, decrease)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sale, decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(revenue, increase)