sale: is call

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is call 1.00
have calls 0.84
have important calls 0.83
be called 101 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(subject, be called 101) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sale, is call)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(subject, be called 101)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(subject, be called 101)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(subject, be called 101) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sale, is call)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sale, is call)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important calls)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sale, have important calls)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sale, have important calls)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sale, have important calls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sale, is call)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sale, is call)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, be called 101)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(sale, is call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subject, be called 101)