salesperson: have bad reputation

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.70 , broker Weight: 0.68 , person Weight: 0.67 , sale Weight: 0.56
Siblings	salesman Weight: 0.37 , receptionist Weight: 0.36 , one person Weight: 0.35 , buyer Weight: 0.35 , office worker Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have bad reputation	1.00
have reputation	0.97
has quality bad	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(broker, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(sale, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(sale, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(broker, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(sale, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(broker, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(receptionist, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(broker, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(sale, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(receptionist, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(receptionist, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(salesperson, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(salesperson, have reputation)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(salesperson, have reputation)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(salesperson, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(salesperson, have reputation)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(salesperson, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(salesperson, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(sale, has quality bad)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(broker, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(receptionist, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(sale, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(salesperson, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(broker, has quality bad)