salivary gland: be considered glands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, lymph node
Weight: 0.68
, organ
Weight: 0.66
, body
Weight: 0.65
, gland
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.44
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.44
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.43
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.42
, prostate gland
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered glands 1.00
be considered accessory glands 0.90
have considered pancreas liver 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gland, be considered accessory glands)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gland, be considered glands)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gland, be considered glands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gland, be considered accessory glands)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(gland, have considered pancreas liver)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(salivary gland, be considered glands)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(salivary gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(salivary gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gland, be considered glands)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gland, have considered pancreas liver)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gland, be considered glands)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(gland, be considered accessory glands)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(salivary gland, be considered glands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gland, have considered pancreas liver)