sample: be better than population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, picture
Weight: 0.58
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings urine
Weight: 0.67
, stool
Weight: 0.55
, wafer
Weight: 0.53
, raw material
Weight: 0.34
, colloid
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than population 1.00
be used more than population 0.95
be related to population 0.89
be preferred to population 0.86
be better than census 0.81
be representative of population 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sample, be better than population)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sample, be used more than population)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sample, be used more than population)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sample, be used more than population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sample, be related to population)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sample, be related to population)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sample, be preferred to population)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sample, be preferred to population)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(sample, be used more than population)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sample, be better than census)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sample, be representative of population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sample, be related to population)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sample, be preferred to population)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sample, be related to population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(sample, be preferred to population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sample, be representative of population)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sample, be better than census)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sample, be representative of population)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sample, be representative of population)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sample, be better than census)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sample, be better than census)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sample, be better than population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sample, be better than population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sample, be better than population)