samuel de champlain: was chosen for trip

Related concepts

Parents	explorer Weight: 0.50 , missionary Weight: 0.39
Siblings	charles darwin Weight: 0.32 , priest Weight: 0.26 , geologist Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was chosen for trip	1.00
be chosen	0.79
visit oedipus	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(priest, be chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(priest, be chosen) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(priest, be chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was chosen for trip) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(priest, be chosen)