samuel de champlain: was looking for pacific ocean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explorer
Weight: 0.50
, missionary
Weight: 0.39
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.32
, priest
Weight: 0.26
, geologist
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was looking for pacific ocean 1.00
was looking for ocean 0.91
were looking for route to asia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(explorer, were looking for route to asia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(explorer, were looking for route to asia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(explorer, were looking for route to asia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(explorer, were looking for route to asia)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was looking for ocean)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for ocean)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for ocean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(explorer, were looking for route to asia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(samuel de champlain, was looking for pacific ocean)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(explorer, were looking for route to asia)