samuel de champlain: was remembered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explorer
Weight: 0.50
, missionary
Weight: 0.39
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.32
, priest
Weight: 0.26
, geologist
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was remembered 1.00
be remembered today 0.96
be known as father 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(charles darwin, be remembered today)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(charles darwin, be known as father)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(charles darwin, be remembered today)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(charles darwin, be remembered today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(charles darwin, be known as father)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(charles darwin, be known as father)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was remembered)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, be remembered today)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, be remembered today)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, be remembered today)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, be remembered today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was remembered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(charles darwin, be remembered today)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was remembered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(charles darwin, be known as father)