samurai: were paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.64
, warrior
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.48
, title
Weight: 0.47
, word
Weight: 0.46
Siblings knight
Weight: 0.34
, ninja
Weight: 0.34
, gladiator
Weight: 0.33
, vampire
Weight: 0.33
, zombie
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were paid 1.00
were paid by daimyo 0.80
were needed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gladiator, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gladiator, were needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(samurai, were paid)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(samurai, were paid by daimyo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(samurai, were needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(samurai, were paid by daimyo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(samurai, were paid by daimyo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(samurai, were needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were paid by daimyo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(samurai, were needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(samurai, were paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(gladiator, were needed)