samurai: were trained

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.64
, warrior
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.48
, title
Weight: 0.47
, word
Weight: 0.46
Siblings knight
Weight: 0.34
, ninja
Weight: 0.34
, gladiator
Weight: 0.33
, vampire
Weight: 0.33
, zombie
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were trained 1.00
get chosen trained 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, were trained)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(knight, were trained)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(knight, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(knight, were trained)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(gladiator, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(gladiator, were trained)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(samurai, were trained)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(samurai, get chosen trained)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(samurai, get chosen trained)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(samurai, get chosen trained)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(samurai, get chosen trained)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were trained)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(samurai, were trained)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knight, were trained)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samurai, were trained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(gladiator, were trained)