san antonio: be de padua use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be de padua use 1.00
be de padua use today 0.98
is de valero 0.97
is de valero important 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(san antonio, be de padua use)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(san antonio, is de valero)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be de padua use today)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is de valero important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is de valero)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is de valero)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(san antonio, is de valero)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(san antonio, be de padua use today)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(san antonio, be de padua use today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(san antonio, is de valero important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is de valero important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(san antonio, is de valero important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be de padua use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(san antonio, be de padua use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(san antonio, be de padua use)