san antonio: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(san jose, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(san jose, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(san antonio, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san jose, is boring)