san antonio: is good city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good city 1.00
is city 0.93
be called city 0.89
be called military city 0.78
be good place live 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(austin, is city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(austin, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new york, be called city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(austin, is city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new york, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(austin, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be good place live)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(austin, be good place live)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(austin, is city)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, be good place live)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be called city)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is city)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be called city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(austin, is city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be called city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(austin, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is good city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(san francisco, is city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(san francisco, be called city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be called city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(san diego, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(san diego, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(san jose, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(san jose, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(san francisco, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(san antonio, is good city)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san antonio, is city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(san antonio, is city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(san antonio, be called city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(san antonio, be called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be called city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(san antonio, be good place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(san antonio, be called military city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be good place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, be good place live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be called military city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be called military city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, be called military city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(san antonio, is good city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(austin, is city)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(austin, be good place live)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new mexico, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(san francisco, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be called city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(san jose, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san diego, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(los angeles, be called city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(austin, is city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(austin, be good place live)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(san antonio, is good city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new mexico, be good place live)