san diego: was built in first place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.75
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, mexico
Weight: 0.66
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.37
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built in first place 1.00
was built in place 0.97
be as place live 0.79
be good place live 0.79
be best place live 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(san francisco, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(los angeles, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(san francisco, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mexico, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be good place live)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be best place live)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be best place live)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be good place live)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be good place live)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be best place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(new mexico, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(san francisco, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(los angeles, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(los angeles, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(san francisco, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(vancouver, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(seattle, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seattle, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(san jose, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(san jose, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san antonio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be good place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(vancouver, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be best place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san antonio, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be best place live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(seattle, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(seattle, be best place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(san diego, was built in first place)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(san diego, was built in place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in place)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(san diego, be as place live)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in place)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san diego, be good place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san diego, be best place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(san diego, be as place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(san diego, be as place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(san diego, be good place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(san diego, be good place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(san diego, be best place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san diego, be best place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be best place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be as place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, be good place live)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(los angeles, be best place live)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new mexico, be good place live)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, be best place live)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mexico, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seattle, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(san jose, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vancouver, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san antonio, be best place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, be best place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vancouver, be best place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, be good place live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(los angeles, be good place live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new mexico, be good place live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mexico, be good place live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(los angeles, be best place live)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san diego, was built in first place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, be best place live)