san francisco: ban plastic straws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
ban plastic straws 1.00
ban straws 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seattle, ban straws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(seattle, ban straws)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(seattle, ban straws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(san francisco, ban plastic straws)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(san francisco, ban straws)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(san francisco, ban straws)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, ban straws)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, ban straws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, ban plastic straws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san francisco, ban plastic straws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, ban plastic straws)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(seattle, ban straws)