san francisco: be at west coast

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, japan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at west coast 1.00
be at west coast of north america 0.95
be a part of far east 0.84
be both west and east of asia 0.82
be west of texas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(north america, be both west and east of asia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(north america, be both west and east of asia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(north america, be both west and east of asia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(japan, be a part of far east)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(north america, be both west and east of asia)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(japan, be a part of far east)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(japan, be a part of far east)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(san francisco, be at west coast)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be west of texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(north america, be both west and east of asia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(japan, be a part of far east)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(san diego, be at west coast of north america)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(san francisco, be at west coast)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(north america, be both west and east of asia)