san francisco: has time yesterday

Related concepts

Parents	san diego Weight: 0.83 , los angeles Weight: 0.74 , mexico city Weight: 0.69 , north america Weight: 0.67
Siblings	san jose Weight: 0.80 , vancouver Weight: 0.62 , des moines Weight: 0.61 , seattle Weight: 0.60 , exploratorium Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has time yesterday	1.00
have days	0.76
was solano	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(los angeles, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(north america, have days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(los angeles, has time yesterday)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(north america, have days)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(north america, have days)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(los angeles, has time yesterday)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(san jose, has time yesterday)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(los angeles, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(north america, have days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(san jose, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(san jose, has time yesterday)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(san francisco, has time yesterday)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(san francisco, was solano)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(san francisco, was solano)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(san francisco, was solano)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was solano)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(los angeles, has time yesterday)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(north america, have days)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(san jose, has time yesterday)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(los angeles, has time yesterday)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(san francisco, has time yesterday) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(north america, have days)