san francisco: is unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unique 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mexico city, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, is unique)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(los angeles, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, is unique)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is unique)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is unique)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is unique)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is unique)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mexico city, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is unique)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(los angeles, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(san francisco, is unique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, is unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(los angeles, is unique)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexico city, is unique)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(los angeles, is unique)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(san francisco, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexico city, is unique)