sanction: vary from state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, punishment
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings suspension
Weight: 0.75
, dismissal
Weight: 0.69
, contempt
Weight: 0.66
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.65
, ban
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
vary from state 1.00
vary to state 0.99
differ from practice 0.80
differ from mesopotamian practice 0.80
differ from solution 0.77
differ from ancient practice 0.77
differ from ancient mesopotamian practice 0.77
be different 0.77
differ from logic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sanction, vary from state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(suspension, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(suspension, differ from solution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sanction, vary from state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(suspension, differ from solution)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(suspension, differ from solution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(suspension, be different)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(suspension, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sanction, vary from state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary to state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sanction, vary to state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sanction, vary to state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(sanction, vary to state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sanction, vary from state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(suspension, differ from solution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(suspension, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(sanction, vary from state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(punishment, differ from ancient mesopotamian practice)