sand: be at grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, soil
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.35
, asphalt
Weight: 0.35
, shallow water
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grind 1.00
be find in grind 0.95
be make up of tiny grind rock 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(soil, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sand, be at grind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(soil, be at grind)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(soil, be at grind)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(soil, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sand, be at grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(sand, be at grind)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sand, be make up of tiny grind rock)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(sand, be make up of tiny grind rock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sand, be make up of tiny grind rock)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sand, be make up of tiny grind rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sand, be at grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sand, be at grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soil, be at grind)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(sand, be at grind)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soil, be at grind)