sand: be important in soil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.65
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, soil
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, gravel
Weight: 0.34
, clay
Weight: 0.34
, iron ore
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in soil 1.00
be important to soil 1.00
be in soil 0.97
be differernt from soil 0.96
affect soil 0.94
be most in soil 0.94
be related to soil 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clay, be in soil)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(clay, be important in soil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(clay, be in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(clay, be in soil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(clay, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(clay, be important in soil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sand, be important in soil)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(sand, be in soil)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sand, be in soil)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sand, be most in soil)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sand, be in soil)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sand, be in soil)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be important in soil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sand, be important in soil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(clay, be in soil)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be important in soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(clay, be important in soil)