sand: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.65
, hazard
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, soil
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, gravel
Weight: 0.34
, clay
Weight: 0.34
, iron ore
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00
is desert 0.99
get in desert 0.98
get to desert 0.98
be made in deserts 0.85
be abiotic factor of desert 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sand, be in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sand, is desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sand, is desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sand, is desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sand, is desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sand, be abiotic factor of desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sand, be abiotic factor of desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sand, be abiotic factor of desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sand, get in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sand, get to desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sand, get in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sand, get in desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sand, be abiotic factor of desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sand, get in desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sand, get to desert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sand, get to desert)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sand, get to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sand, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sand, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sand, be in desert)