santa fe: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, san diego
Weight: 0.35
, colorado
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(santa fe, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(colorado, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(san diego, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(colorado, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(colorado, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(santa fe, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(santa fe, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san diego, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(colorado, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(santa fe, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)