satan: be portrayed as evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents god
Weight: 0.66
, enemy
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, demon
Weight: 0.63
, deity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings jesus christ
Weight: 0.37
, saddam hussein
Weight: 0.36
, devil
Weight: 0.36
, jesus
Weight: 0.36
, lord
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be portrayed as evil 1.00
be considered evil 0.90
be considdered evil 0.88
has quality evil 0.84
be portrayed as ugly entity 0.83
be depicted as god 's dark aspect 0.82
was portrayed in ages 0.82
be portrayed as entity 0.82
be depicted as god 's aspect 0.82
be portrayed musical 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(demon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(demon, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demon, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lord, has quality evil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(demon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lord, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lord, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, be considered evil)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(satan, be considdered evil)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(satan, be considered evil)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(satan, was portrayed in ages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(satan, be considdered evil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed as entity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed as ugly entity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(satan, be considered evil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed musical)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(satan, be depicted as god 's dark aspect)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(satan, has quality evil)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(satan, was portrayed in ages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(satan, be depicted as god 's aspect)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(satan, be considdered evil)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(satan, be portrayed musical)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(satan, was portrayed in ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(satan, be portrayed as ugly entity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(satan, be portrayed musical)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(satan, be portrayed as entity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(satan, be portrayed as entity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(satan, has quality evil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(satan, be depicted as god 's dark aspect)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(satan, be portrayed as ugly entity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(satan, be depicted as god 's aspect)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(satan, be depicted as god 's dark aspect)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(satan, be depicted as god 's aspect)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(satan, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(satan, be considered evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(satan, be considdered evil)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(satan, has quality evil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed musical)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as ugly entity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(satan, be depicted as god 's dark aspect)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(satan, be depicted as god 's aspect)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as entity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(satan, was portrayed in ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(demon, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lord, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(satan, be portrayed as evil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(demon, has quality evil)