sauna: be at motel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.52
, pleasure
Weight: 0.49
, hotel
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spa
Weight: 0.33
, hotel room
Weight: 0.33
, massage
Weight: 0.33
, shower head
Weight: 0.32
, gym
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at motel 1.00
be at hotel 0.84
has many hotel room 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, has many hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sauna, be at motel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel, has many hotel room)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hotel, has many hotel room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, has many hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sauna, be at motel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(sauna, be at motel)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sauna, be at hotel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sauna, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sauna, be at hotel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sauna, be at hotel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sauna, be at motel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sauna, be at motel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hotel, has many hotel room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sauna, be at motel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hotel, has many hotel room)