savings: be important for future

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.58
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.86
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, investment
Weight: 0.33
, bank
Weight: 0.33
, dairy product
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for future 1.00
be important for growth 0.78
be important for economic growth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(financial institution, be important for growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, be important for future)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, be important for future)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(financial institution, be important for growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, be important for growth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, be important for economic growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for growth)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for economic growth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(financial institution, be important for growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(savings, be important for future)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(savings, be important for future)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(investment, be important for growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(investment, be important for growth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(investment, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, be important for economic growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(savings, be important for future)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, be important for growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for economic growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(savings, be important for economic growth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(savings, be important for growth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(savings, be important for growth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(savings, be important for economic growth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(savings, be important for economic growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(savings, be important for future)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(investment, be important for economic growth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(investment, be important for growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(savings, be important for future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for growth)