saxophone: is tuned differently

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woodwind instrument
Weight: 0.72
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.68
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.68
, woodwind
Weight: 0.68
Siblings clarinet
Weight: 0.41
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.40
, sax
Weight: 0.40
, bass clarinet
Weight: 0.40
, flute
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tuned differently 1.00
be tuned to 440 0.92
is tuned 0.92
be tuned to different keys 0.89
be tuned to keys 0.86
be tuned to b flat 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to 440)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to different keys)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(instrument, is tuned)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(instrument, is tuned)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(instrument, be tuned to 440)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(instrument, be tuned to different keys)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be tuned to 440)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be tuned to different keys)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be tuned to keys)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is tuned)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, be tuned to b flat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to 440)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to different keys)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(instrument, is tuned)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(instrument, be tuned to keys)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(clarinet, be tuned to b flat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(clarinet, be tuned to b flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(saxophone, is tuned differently)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is tuned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(saxophone, is tuned)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(instrument, is tuned)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to keys)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to 440)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to different keys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(clarinet, be tuned to b flat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(instrument, is tuned)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to keys)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to 440)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(saxophone, is tuned differently)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(instrument, be tuned to different keys)