scala: be good for big data

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.57
, programming language
Weight: 0.55
, company
Weight: 0.48
, technology
Weight: 0.40
, place
Weight: 0.39
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.33
, tcl
Weight: 0.32
, sql
Weight: 0.31
, lua
Weight: 0.31
, english language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for big data 1.00
be used for big data 0.96
be good for data 0.96
be used for data 0.88
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scala, be good for big data)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tcl, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(scala, be good for big data)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tcl, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tcl, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(scala, be good for big data)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(scala, be used for big data)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(scala, be used for big data)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(scala, be used for big data)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for data)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scala, be good for data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(scala, be used for big data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scala, be good for data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(scala, be good for data)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(scala, be used for data)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(scala, be used for data)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(scala, be used for data)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(scala, be used for data)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scala, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scala, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scala, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(scala, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scala, be good for big data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tcl, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(scala, be good for big data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)