scaling: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings shrinking
Weight: 0.39
, cutting
Weight: 0.33
, setting
Weight: 0.32
, trimming
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is popular now 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cutting, is popular now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cutting, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cutting, is popular now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(scaling, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scaling, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(scaling, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scaling, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cutting, is popular now)