scallop: defend

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, seafood
Weight: 0.60
, mollusk
Weight: 0.59
, shellfish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.37
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend 1.00
defend themselves 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mollusk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scallop, defend)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mollusk, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, defend themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mollusk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scallop, defend)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(scallop, defend)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(scallop, defend themselves)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(scallop, defend themselves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(scallop, defend themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(scallop, defend themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scallop, defend)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scallop, defend)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mollusk, defend themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(scallop, defend)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mollusk, defend themselves)