scallop: is fucking hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, seafood
Weight: 0.60
, mollusk
Weight: 0.59
, shellfish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.37
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fucking hard 1.00
is hard 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mollusk, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, is fucking hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mollusk, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(shrimp, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(scallop, is fucking hard)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scallop, is hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(scallop, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scallop, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, is fucking hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mollusk, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shrimp, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, is fucking hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mollusk, is hard)