scavenger: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.59
, wild animal
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.54
, team
Weight: 0.48
, event
Weight: 0.47
Siblings vulture
Weight: 0.61
, jackal
Weight: 0.60
, magpie
Weight: 0.46
, cassowary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be important in ecosystem 1.00
be very important in ecosystem 0.95
be important in ecosystems 0.91
be important for environment 0.80
help in ecological system 0.79
be useful for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vulture, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(vulture, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vulture, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important in ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be very important in ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important in ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scavenger, be important in ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scavenger, be important in ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, help in ecological system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(scavenger, be important in ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(scavenger, help in ecological system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(scavenger, be very important in ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scavenger, be important in ecosystems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be useful for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(scavenger, be useful for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be important in ecosystems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(scavenger, help in ecological system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(scavenger, help in ecological system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be useful for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(scavenger, be important for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be very important in ecosystem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(scavenger, be important for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(scavenger, be useful for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be important for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scavenger, be very important in ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vulture, be important to ecosystem)