scavenger: differ from deomposers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.59
, wild animal
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.54
, team
Weight: 0.48
, event
Weight: 0.47
Siblings vulture
Weight: 0.61
, jackal
Weight: 0.60
, magpie
Weight: 0.46
, cassowary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from deomposers 1.00
differ in community 0.89
differ from other consumers 0.85
differ from consumers 0.83
be different 0.76
is different 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vulture, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vulture, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vulture, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(scavenger, differ from consumers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(scavenger, differ from consumers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ in community)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, be different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(scavenger, is different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ from other consumers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(scavenger, differ from other consumers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(scavenger, be different)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(scavenger, differ from consumers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(scavenger, be different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(scavenger, differ in community)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scavenger, is different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(scavenger, differ in community)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scavenger, differ in community)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scavenger, differ from other consumers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, is different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ from consumers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scavenger, be different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(scavenger, differ from other consumers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(scavenger, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(scavenger, differ from deomposers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, differ from deomposers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vulture, be different)