scavenger: talk in way

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.59
, wild animal
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.54
, team
Weight: 0.48
, event
Weight: 0.47
Siblings vulture
Weight: 0.61
, jackal
Weight: 0.60
, magpie
Weight: 0.46
, cassowary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
talk in way 1.00
talk in retarded way 0.85
talk funny 0.83
do 0.76
eat things 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vulture, eat things)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(jackal, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(jackal, do)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(jackal, do)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(vulture, eat things)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(vulture, eat things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(scavenger, talk in way)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk funny)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in retarded way)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(scavenger, talk in retarded way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(scavenger, eat things)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(scavenger, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scavenger, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scavenger, talk in retarded way)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scavenger, talk in retarded way)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(scavenger, do)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(scavenger, eat things)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(scavenger, eat things)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, eat things)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(scavenger, talk funny)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scavenger, talk funny)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(scavenger, talk funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(scavenger, talk in way)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jackal, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scavenger, talk in way)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(vulture, eat things)