scenery: be at picture

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, role
Weight: 0.48
, location
Weight: 0.47
, object
Weight: 0.47
, production
Weight: 0.47
Siblings landscape
Weight: 0.33
, solitude
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32
, enjoyment
Weight: 0.32
, nice
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at picture 1.00
be used to take picture 0.92
be at photograph 0.83
be defined as picture of countryside 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(landscape, be defined as picture of countryside)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(landscape, be defined as picture of countryside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(landscape, be defined as picture of countryside)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(scenery, be at picture)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(scenery, be used to take picture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(scenery, be used to take picture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(scenery, be at photograph)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(scenery, be at photograph)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be used to take picture)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be at picture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(scenery, be at picture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be at picture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(landscape, be defined as picture of countryside)