scenery: be beautiful

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, role
Weight: 0.48
, location
Weight: 0.47
, object
Weight: 0.47
, production
Weight: 0.47
Siblings landscape
Weight: 0.33
, solitude
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32
, enjoyment
Weight: 0.32
, nice
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beautiful 1.00
be very beautiful 0.95
be beautifull 0.80
be beautiful as well as useful 0.80
be majestic 0.80
be breathtaking 0.77
be very romantic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scenery, be beautiful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(landscape, be breathtaking)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(landscape, be very romantic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(landscape, be very beautiful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, be majestic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(scenery, be beautiful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(landscape, be very beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(landscape, be very beautiful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(waterfall, be majestic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(waterfall, be majestic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(landscape, be very romantic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(landscape, be very romantic)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(landscape, be breathtaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(landscape, be breathtaking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(scenery, be beautiful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(scenery, be beautifull)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautifull)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(scenery, be beautifull)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scenery, be beautifull)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scenery, be beautiful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(waterfall, be majestic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(landscape, be very beautiful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(landscape, be breathtaking)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(landscape, be very romantic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scenery, be beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)