scenery: be important in plays

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, role
Weight: 0.48
, theme
Weight: 0.48
, location
Weight: 0.47
Siblings relaxing
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, solitude
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32
, enjoyment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in plays 1.00
be used in play 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theme, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scenery, be important in plays)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(theme, be important in plays)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(theme, be important in plays)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theme, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(scenery, be important in plays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(scenery, be important in plays)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(scenery, be used in play)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scenery, be used in play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(scenery, be used in play)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be used in play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be important in plays)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scenery, be important in plays)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(theme, be important in plays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scenery, be important in plays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(theme, be important in plays)