scenery: be very pretty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, role
Weight: 0.48
, location
Weight: 0.47
, object
Weight: 0.47
, production
Weight: 0.47
Siblings landscape
Weight: 0.33
, solitude
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32
, enjoyment
Weight: 0.32
, nice
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very pretty 1.00
be very beautiful 0.85
appear far than they really be 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, appear far than they really be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scenery, be very pretty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(object, appear far than they really be)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(object, appear far than they really be)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(landscape, be very beautiful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, appear far than they really be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scenery, be very pretty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(landscape, be very beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(landscape, be very beautiful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(scenery, be very pretty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scenery, be very pretty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(object, appear far than they really be)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(landscape, be very beautiful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(scenery, be very pretty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(object, appear far than they really be)