schistosomiasis: be common in endemic areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.59
, infection
Weight: 0.58
, parasite
Weight: 0.57
, illness
Weight: 0.50
, condition
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, malaria
Weight: 0.36
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.35
, hookworm
Weight: 0.35
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common in endemic areas 1.00
be prevalent in endemic areas 0.97
be prevalent in areas 0.91
be common in areas 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in endemic areas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in endemic areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be common in areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in endemic areas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(schistosomiasis, be prevalent in endemic areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(schistosomiasis, be common in endemic areas)