science: writer of is fiction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
writer of is fiction 1.00
being fiction 0.87
keep fiction 0.87
becoming fiction 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(science, writer of is fiction)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(science, keep fiction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(science, keep fiction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(science, keep fiction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(science, becoming fiction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(science, becoming fiction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(science, becoming fiction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, keep fiction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(science, being fiction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(science, being fiction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(science, becoming fiction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(science, being fiction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(science, being fiction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(science, writer of is fiction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(science, writer of is fiction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(science, writer of is fiction)