scientist: use photography in their research

Related concepts

Parents	researcher Weight: 0.70 , author Weight: 0.69 , expert Weight: 0.68 , activist Weight: 0.66
Siblings	geneticist Weight: 0.74 , physicist Weight: 0.74 , meteorologist Weight: 0.72 , computer scientist Weight: 0.72 , geologist Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property	Similarity
use photography in their research	1.00
research	0.80
study research	0.78
wants to conduct research	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(researcher, study research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(scientist, use photography in their research)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(researcher, research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(scientist, use photography in their research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(researcher, research)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(researcher, study research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(researcher, study research)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(researcher, research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(researcher, study research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(researcher, research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(scientist, use photography in their research)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(scientist, research)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(scientist, wants to conduct research)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(scientist, research)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(scientist, wants to conduct research)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(scientist, wants to conduct research)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(scientist, research)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(scientist, research)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(scientist, wants to conduct research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(scientist, use photography in their research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(researcher, research)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(researcher, study research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(researcher, research)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(scientist, use photography in their research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(researcher, study research)