scientist: use spreadsheets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.70
, author
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
, activist
Weight: 0.66
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.74
, physicist
Weight: 0.74
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.72
, geologist
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
use spreadsheets 1.00
use graphs 0.78
use computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(scientist, use spreadsheets)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use graphs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(scientist, use graphs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(scientist, use computer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(scientist, use graphs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use graphs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use spreadsheets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use spreadsheets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use spreadsheets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computer)