score: be in tennis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, bonus
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
Siblings birdie
Weight: 0.56
, percentile
Weight: 0.46
, bogey
Weight: 0.38
, spaghetti western
Weight: 0.35
, win
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tennis 1.00
be in tennis called 0.98
be determined in golf tournament 0.82
be determined in pro-am golf tournament 0.82
be determined in pro golf tournament 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(score, be in tennis)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(score, be in tennis called)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(score, be in tennis called)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(score, be in tennis called)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(score, be determined in pro-am golf tournament)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(score, be determined in pro-am golf tournament)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(score, be determined in pro-am golf tournament)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(score, be in tennis called)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(score, be determined in pro golf tournament)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(score, be determined in pro-am golf tournament)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(score, be determined in golf tournament)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(score, be determined in pro golf tournament)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(score, be determined in golf tournament)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(score, be determined in pro golf tournament)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(score, be determined in pro golf tournament)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(score, be determined in golf tournament)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(score, be determined in golf tournament)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(score, be in tennis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(score, be in tennis)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(score, be in tennis)